01 / The starting point
The problem to solve.
A convincing business idea is easy to describe. Assessing whether there is evidence behind it requires a different process: finding sources, checking demand signals and identifying the assumptions that still need testing.
02 / My contribution
Where I came in.
I developed an independent opportunity-research product to support my own investigation and comparison of potential markets and products.
03 / Implementation
What I worked on.
- 01
Research flows combining web sources and search-demand data.
- 02
Structured assessment with source references and checks on supporting evidence.
- 03
Market-comparison and reporting views that retain uncertainty instead of presenting every idea as validated.
Let weak evidence constrain the conclusion. A score should not look stronger simply because a model wrote a persuasive explanation.
04 / Delivery
A repeatable research process.
A working research product with source-backed assessment and documented evidence checks. Further quality improvements are being developed alongside the existing version.
An independent product used to support research and identify assumptions for further testing.
Could this apply to your team?
A similar problem,
your own context.
Founders and teams comparing ideas, investigating search demand or deciding which assumptions to test before investing in a build.
Discuss something similar ↗