Chat with us
← All case studies

Workflows / Editorial & publishing

Give content production a working process.

Research, drafting, review and publishing brought into one working environment, with an editor in control.

ContextAgency partnership
Delivery stageImplemented system
FocusA connected editorial process
Illustration: Source material to Research & draft to Editorial review to PublishSource materialResearch & draftEditorial reviewPublish

Process illustration. Recreated for this portfolio; no client interface or data shown.

  1. 01Source material
  2. 02Research & draft
  3. 03Editorial review
  4. 04Publish

01 / The starting point

The problem to solve.

A publishing team needed a practical way to move from incoming material and research to reviewed articles and social content. Generating more text alone would not solve the coordination, source checking and publishing work around it.

02 / My contribution

Where I came in.

I developed the editorial command centre and the connections between research, AI-assisted drafting, review and the publishing site, working through an agency partnership.

03 / Implementation

What I worked on.

  1. 01

    A shared workspace for article planning, drafting, source references and editorial review.

  2. 02

    Separate steps for generated content, checks and human editing, with visible publication states.

  3. 03

    Publishing integrations and tools for preparing channel-specific social content.

A design decision that mattered

Keep editorial decisions visible. The public website and the internal workspace have separate responsibilities, so generating an article is not the same action as publishing it.

04 / Delivery

A connected editorial process.

An implemented editorial workspace connecting research, drafting, review and publication, with source references and editorial decisions kept in the same process.

Publishing connections are configured for each channel, with the editor responsible for release.

Could this apply to your team?

A similar problem,
your own context.

Teams producing regular articles, reports or social content who need a consistent review process around AI-assisted work.

Discuss something similar ↗

Your next project

What needs to
work better?

Tell me about the process, the people using it and the outcome you need. We can work out a useful first step.

Discuss your project